This happens all the time.
The media reports on some new scientific theory that promises to “change the world of (insert scientific field here) FOREVER”. Then three months later, when the theory is disproved or revealed to be pseudo-science, the general population takes its anger out on Science. They use it as “proof” that Science is stupid and has no idea what its talking about.
As a science lover, this makes me so sad. Please don’t blame Science for “lying” to you because some CutNPaste HuffPo hack went looking for a sensational headline and didn’t bother to do any research.
The most recent example is last month’s declaration that neutrinos have been measured moving faster than the speed of light. Journalists speculated this would rock the world of physics and challenge Einstein’s theory of relativity. Less than a month later, outlets are already changing their tune, running stories that say the study probably means nothing and will be proved inaccurate.
Renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence M. Krauss published an opinion piece addressing the media’s misconceptions about the scientific method, and why it’s so dangerous to report sensational stories before the scientific process is complete.
A dramatic claim from a distinguished laboratory that turns out to be false reinforces the notion that somehow science is not to be trusted, that one can dismiss theories one finds inconvenient, even those whose predictions do agree with observations. This particular claim also reinforces the notion that scientific revolutions sweep away all that went before them. This is not how science progresses.
Too often today, science is done by news release rather than waiting for refereed publication. Because a significant fraction of experimental results ultimately never get published or are not later confirmed, providing unfiltered results to a largely untutored public is irresponsible.
Permalink: http://tmblr.co/ZZZn1yAb6G8c